Explaining the Design Criteria of Educational-Therapeutic Spaces for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder with Emphasis on the Impact of Environment on Learning and Treatment (Case Study: Tabriz City)

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Postdoctoral Researcher in Urban Design, Faculty of Architecture and Urban Planning Engineering, Tarbiat Dabir Shahid Rajaei University, Tehran, Iran..

2 Department of Education, Ministry of Education, Tabriz, East Azerbaijan Province, Iran

Abstract
Aims:
The design of educational and therapeutic spaces for children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) requires a comprehensive, empathetic, and evidence-based approach that addresses their unique sensory, perceptual, and behavioral needs. Autistic children often experience heightened sensitivity to environmental stimuli, difficulty with transitions, and challenges in communication and social interaction. These characteristics demand spatial solutions that are not only functionally efficient but also psychologically supportive and adaptable to individual differences. The primary aim of this study is to analyze and formulate a set of design criteria for creating safe, calming, and effective environments that facilitate both therapeutic interventions and educational engagement. Such environments should minimize sensory overload, promote predictability, enhance social interactions, and foster a sense of autonomy and inclusion. Despite growing awareness, many existing educational and therapeutic centers lack design strategies tailored to the specific needs of children with ASD, leading to elevated stress, reduced learning efficacy, and increased pressure on families and caregivers. This research responds to this critical gap by integrating interdisciplinary insights from architecture, psychology, and autism studies to develop a conceptual and practical model of spatial design. By incorporating international design guidelines alongside locally contextualized needs, the study aims to provide a robust and culturally adaptable framework. Ultimately, the proposed model seeks to improve the quality of life for autistic children, support their developmental goals, and serve as a replicable design approach for similar institutions both nationally and globally.
Materials & Methods:
This applied study employed a mixed-methods (qualitative–quantitative) approach. In the qualitative phase, semi-structured interviews with 20 experts were analyzed using MAXQDA 2024, resulting in five main categories, 12 indicators, and 36 sub-indicators. In the quantitative phase, the proposed model was validated using PLS-SEM. The statistical population comprised 202 parents of children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) attending the Pouyesh Autism Center in Tabriz, from which 133 participants were selected using Cochran’s formula and simple random sampling. Reliability and validity were confirmed using Cronbach’s alpha, Composite Reliability (CR), Average Variance Extracted (AVE), Fornell–Larcker criterion, and HTMT. Data analysis was performed using SmartPLS 4.
Findings:
The findings confirmed that the proposed design model significantly enhances the learning and therapeutic outcomes of children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). Five key design dimensions were identified: sensory stimulus reduction, spatial organization, calming spaces, freedom of movement, and visual wayfinding. Quantitative results showed that reducing sensory stimuli and eliminating physical barriers had the strongest positive effects, followed by calming environments and organized spatial layouts. Qualitative findings highlighted the importance of controlled lighting, acoustic comfort, soft colors, flexible spaces, and sensory-friendly materials. Overall, integrating architectural, sensory, and behavioral design principles provides an effective framework for creating supportive educational and therapeutic environments for children with ASD.
Conclusion: he proposed design model demonstrates that sensory-sensitive and user-centered educational environments can significantly improve learning, therapy, and well-being among children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). The findings provide practical design guidelines for architects, educators, and policymakers to develop more inclusive, supportive, and effective educational and therapeutic facilities.

Keywords

Subjects

 
1-      Abdelmoula, E., Bouayed Abdelmoula, N., & Abdelmoula, B. (2024). Guidelines of inclusive architecture design for autism spectrum disorder: What is new? European Psychiatry, 67(Suppl. 1), S114–S115. https://doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2024.272.
2-      Abdou, H. M., & Younis, N. A. (2026). Sensory and interactive architectural design strategies for inclusive early childhood learning environments supporting neurodevelopmental diversity. Architecture, 6(1), 44. https://doi.org/10.3390/architecture6010044.
3-      Afshinmehr, V., & Akbari Kiaroud, S. M. (2021). Providing a model for the responsiveness of ordinary schools to children with autism based on behaviorism. Educational and School Studies, 10(1), 33–52. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.2423494.1400.10.1.2.7.  (Persian)
4-      Al Qutub, R., Luo, Z., Vasilikou, C., Tavassoli, T., Essah, E., & Marcham, H. (2024). Impacts of school environment quality on autistic pupil's behaviours: A systematic review. Building and Environment, 265, 111981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2024.111981.
5-      Almaz, A., & Mohamed, I. (2024). The role of architectural and interior design in creating an autism-friendly environment to promote sensory-mitigated design as one of the autistic needs. International Design Journal, 14(2), 239–255. https://doi.org/10.21608/idj.2024.340122.
6-      Barbazi, N., & Wang, C. X. (2023). Perceiving through colors: Visual supports for children with autism. Human Factors in Aging and Special Needs, 88, 104–112. https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1003667.
7-      Barker, R. G. (1968). Ecological psychology: Concepts and methods for studying the environment of human behavior. Stanford University Press.
8-      Black, M. H., McGarry, S., Churchill, L., D'Arcy, E., Dalgleish, J., Nash, I., Jones, A., Tse, T. Y., Gibson, J., Bölte, S., & Girdler, S. (2022). Considerations of the built environment for autistic individuals: A review of the literature. Autism: The International Journal of Research and Practice, 26(8), 1904–1915. https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613221102753.
9-      Botha, M., Dibb, B., & Frost, D. M. (2020). Autism is me: An investigation of how autistic individuals make sense of autism and stigma. Disability & Society, 37(3), 427–453. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2020.1822782
10-   Dami, S., & Esmaildokht, M. (2023). Comparative study of biophilic approach and healing landscapes in their effectiveness on the senses of children with autism. Manzar, 15(64), 16–27. https://doi.org/10.22034/manzar.2023.374015.2214.  (Persian)
11-   Doaee, M., Ghomeishi, M., & Sotoudeh, H. (2024). Architectural strategies for fostering creativity and enhancing education for children with autism. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 15(12), 103055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2024.103055
12-   Friedman, S., Morrison, A. S., & Shibata, A. (2024). Practitioner perspectives on nature-based learning for autistic children. The Journal of Environmental Education, 56(1), 21–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2024.2401785
13-   Gharaei, B., Hayeri Zadeh, S. M. S., & Ghomeishi, M. (2024). Developing a neuroarchitecture-based user-centered design for elementary schools in Tehran. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 15(9), Article 102898. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2024.102898
14-   Irani, N., Bavar, S., & Mirzakhani Araqi, N. (2023). Investigating the relationship between physical and architectural factors of educational-therapeutic rehabilitation spaces and the quality of rehabilitation services for children with autism spectrum disorder from the perspective of occupational therapists and their parents. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 12(1), 164–185. https://doi.org/10.32598/SJRM.12.1.11 (Persian)
15-   Irani, N., Bavar, S., & Mirzakhani Araqi, N. (2024). Investigating the interior design of rehabilitation centers for children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 13(4), 734–743. https://doi.org/10.32598/SJRM.13.4.3087 (Persian)
16-   Karbalai Hosseini Ghiasvand, A., Soheili, J., & Matin, M. (2022). Design criteria affecting behavioral problems of autistic children in special schools. Armanshahr Architecture & Urban Development, 15(40), 163–175. https://doi.org/10.22034/aaud.2019.172410.1814 (Persian)
17-   Keramati, M., & Zakeri, S. M. H. (2026). Classifying sensory design principles for autism-friendly environments: A PRISMA-based systematic review. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 135, Article 202932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reia.2026.202932
18-   Khamseh Ashari, M., & Tabaiyan, S. M. (2023). Structural analysis and comparison of the architecture of children's educational spaces: Amsterdam Orphanage Center and Isfahan Autism Garden. Interdisciplinary Studies in Architectural and Urban Excellence, 2(1), 141–157. https://doi.org/10.30495/JISAUD.2023.1985675.1079 (Persian)
19-   Khodakhah Jaddi, L., Ghabadian, V., & Shali Amini, V. (2021). The role of environmental graphics and architectural arrangement in the treatment process of hospitalized children from the children's perspective. Rahpouyeh Visual Arts, 4(4), 75–84. https://doi.org/10.22034/ra.2022.249563.  (Persian)
20-   Kotsi, S., Handrinou, S., Iatraki, G., & Soulis, S.-G. (2025). A review of artificial intelligence interventions for students with autism spectrum disorder. Disabilities, 5, 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/disabilities5010007
21-   Love, J. S. (2022). Sensory spaces: Sensory living–studio teaching the design of autism-friendly adult accommodation. Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 16(3), 595–619. https://doi.org/10.1108/ARCH-11-2021-0321
22-   Manning, C., Williams, G., & MacLennan, K. (2023). Sensory-inclusive spaces for autistic people: We need to build the evidence base. Autism, 27(6), 1511–1515. https://doi.org/10.1177/13623613231183541
23-   Ming En, L., Heng Yii Sern, C., Abdul Aziz, Z. B., & Jing Jing, L. (2026). Architectural colour and lighting strategies for autism-friendly physical learning environment in Malaysia. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2026.2621574.
24-   Mohammadi, G., & Habibi, A. (2023). The effect of color on environmental tranquility in the interior spaces of children's psychiatric hospitals from users' perspectives (Case study: Pediatric ward of Roozbeh Psychiatric Hospital). Interdisciplinary Studies of Iranian Architecture, 2(3), 127–146. https://doi.org/10.22133/isia.2023.401474.1048.  (Persian)
25-   Norman, D. (2013). The design of everyday things (Rev. & expanded ed.). Basic Books. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=3905101.
26-   Pashazadeh Azari, Z., Hosseini, S. A., Rassafiani, M., Samadi, S. A., Danvini, H., & Hosseinzadeh, S. (2020). A context-based intervention designed for autism spectrum disorders: An experimental study using a single-case design. Journal of Rehabilitation, 21(1), 120–137. http://dx.doi.org/10.32598/RJ.21.1.2932.1. (Persian)
27-   Pogoda, J., & Majczyk, J. (2022). Educational spaces for students with autism spectrum disorders. Architectus, 3(71), 69–77. https://doi.org/10.37190/arc220307.
28-   Pour Etemad, M., Nazarpoor, M. T., & Pour Etemad, H. R. (2021). Functionalist architectural design of an integrated kindergarten and preschool for children with autism and typically developing children: Introducing psychological needs and characteristics. Journal of Exceptional Children, 21(1), 79–90 http://joec.ir/article-1-1366-en.html.  (Persian)
29-   Rapaport, A. (1982). The meaning of the built environment: A non-verbal communication approach. University of Arizona Press. https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=2591308.
30-   Sartipzadeh, L., Ghasemi Sichani, M., & Mojtahedi, H. (2017). Analysis of the architectural condition of educational centers for children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD): A case study of three autism centers in Isfahan. Journal of Disability Studies, 7(51), 51–51. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.23222840.1396.7.0.14.2.  (Persian)
31-   Shimokura, R., Yanagiawa, K., & Sasaki, S. (2022). Spatial organisation of “therapeutic” spaces for autistic children in special schools: Lessons learnt from the United Kingdom experience. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 22(2), 620–634. https://doi.org/10.1080/13467581.2022.2047982.
32-   Šilc, M., Lavrič, M., & Schmidt, M. (2024). Impact of primary schools’ inclusiveness on the inclusion of students with autism spectrum disorder. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1423206. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1423206.
33-   Teague, S. J., Gray, K. M., Tonge, B. J., & Newman, L. K. (2017). Attachment in children with autism spectrum disorder: A systematic review. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 35, 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2016.12.002.
34-   Tola, G., Talu, V., Congiu, T., Bain, P., & Lindert, J. (2021). Built environment design and people with autism spectrum disorder (ASD): A scoping review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(6), 3203. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18063203.
35-   Torkaman, A., Zarei, R., & Rahimi, M. A. (2024). Presenting a structural model in the design of educational center environments based on treatment and behavior management of children with autism (Case study: 4–7-year-old children at the Bushehr Autism Center). Iranian Journal of Architecture and Urbanism, 11(3), 13–25. https://doi.org/10.30475/isau.2024.427592.2106,  (Persian)
36-   Velayati, S., Rezaei Tabrizi, S., & Yarahmadi, P. (2025). Investigating the effect of environmental components on improving the social skills of children with autism in architectural spaces (Case study: Autism educational centers in Tabriz). Urban Space and Social Life, 4(15), 104–115. https://doi.org/22034/jprd.2025.63773.1128.  (Persian)
37-   Vincent, L. B., Asmus, J. M., Lyons, G. L., Born, T., Leamon, M., DenBleyker, E., & McIntire, H. (2023). Evaluating the effectiveness of a reverse inclusion social skills intervention for children on the autism spectrum. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 53(7), 2647–2662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-022-05513-2.
38-   Wang, Z., Herman, S. S., Mansor, N., & Yan, S. (2026). Sensory stimuli in the built environment for autistic people: A scoping review. Building and Environment, 292, 114271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2026.114271.
39-   Zakarya Habbak, A. L., & Khodeir, L. (2023). Multi-sensory interactive interior design for enhancing skills in children with autism. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, 14(8), 102039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2023.102039.
40-   Zeisel, J. (2006). Inquiry by design: Environment/behavior/neuroscience in architecture, interiors, landscape, and planning (Rev. ed.). W. W. Norton & Company. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.05.001.

  • Receive Date 13 June 2026
  • Revise Date 25 July 2026
  • Accept Date 25 July 2026
  • First Publish Date 12 August 2026
  • Publish Date 23 August 2026