Perceptions of Learning Environment Quality and Implications for Play-Based Design

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Department of Architecture Faculty of Dr. Ali Eqbali Sustainable Development, University College of Omran_Toseeh, Hamedan, Iran

Abstract
This study aims to investigate the integrated role of gamification, game-based learning, and educational space design in enhancing cognitive strength and place attachment among primary school students. In response to the growing need for experience-oriented learning environments in contemporary education, the research proposes a holistic framework that links pedagogical strategies with spatial design to improve learning outcomes. A quantitative, descriptive–analytical and survey-based methodology was employed. Data were collected using a researcher-developed questionnaire based on a five-point Likert scale. The study population consisted of primary school students, and the sample size was determined using Cochran’s formula. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS software, applying Kolmogorov–Smirnov, one-sample t-test, and Friedman ranking tests. The findings revealed that all components of educational space design have a statistically significant effect on the learning experience (p < 0.05), with spatial diversity and environmental quality identified as the most influential factors. Moreover, gamification and game-based learning were found to significantly enhance cognitive engagement and motivation. The results further indicate that learning experience acts as a mediating variable that connects environmental and educational factors with cognitive and emotional outcomes. Ultimately, this mediating process contributes to the enhancement of cognitive strength and the development of place attachment among students. The study concludes that integrating game-based learning strategies with well-designed educational environments can significantly improve learning quality, increase student engagement, and strengthen emotional bonds with school environments in primary education contexts.

Keywords

Subjects

1-      Barrett, P., Davies, F., Zhang, Y., & Barrett, L. (2015). The impact of classroom design on pupils’ learning. Building and Environment, 89, 118–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2015.02.013
2-      Benade, L. (2022). Flexible and innovative learning spaces: An exploration of parental perspectives on change, consultation and participation. European Educational Research Journal, 21(4), 568–584. https://doi.org/10.1177/14749041211041204
3-      Byers, T., Imms, W., & Hartnell-Young, E. (2018). Evaluating teacher and student spatial transition from a traditional classroom to an innovative learning environment. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 58, 156–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.07.004
4-      Cheryan, S., Ziegler, S. A., Plaut, V. C., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2014). Designing classrooms to maximize student achievement. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(1), 4–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732214548677
5-      Frelin, A., & Grannäs, J. (2021). Designing and building robust innovative learning environments. Buildings, 11(8), 345. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11080345
6-      Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., & Sarsa, H. (2014). Does gamification work? A literature review of empirical studies on gamification. In 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 3025–3034). https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2014.377
7-      Hernández, B., Hidalgo, M. C., Salazar-Laplace, M., & Hess-Medler, S. (2007). Place attachment and place identity in natives and non-natives. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(4), 310–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2007.06.003
8-      Imms, W., & Byers, T. (2017). Impact of classroom design on teacher pedagogy and student engagement and performance in mathematics. Learning Environments Research, 20(2), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-016-9210-0
9-      Kashtkaran, P. (2026). Barrasi-ye ta'sir-e shiddat-e nur dar faza-ye amuzeshi bar mizan-e estres-e daneshjuyan [Investigating the effect of lighting intensity in educational spaces on students' stress levels]. Pazhuhesh-ha-ye Memari-ye Novin, 5(4), 65–79. https://doi.org/10.22034/ats.2026.2085292.1025
10-   Lewicka, M. (2011). Place attachment: How far have we come? Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31(3), 207–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.10.001
11-   Mohammadzadeh-Akbari, S., Fathi, R., & Hamzehnezhad, M. (2024). Rahkarhaye mo'asser bar roshd-e angizeshi-ye kudakan-e kamtavan-e zehni bar payeh-ye ravanshenasi-ye mohit-e fazaha-ye amuzeshi [Effective strategies for enhancing motivational development in children with intellectual disabilities based on environmental psychology of educational spaces]. Pazhuhesh-ha-ye Memari-ye Novin, 3(2), 41–52. https://doi.org/10.22034/ats.2023.725720
12-   Plass, J. L., Homer, B. D., & Kinzer, C. K. (2015). Foundations of game-based learning. Educational Psychologist, 50(4), 258–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2015.1122533
13-   Sailer, M., Hense, J. U., Mayr, S. K., & Mandl, H. (2017). How gamification motivates: An experimental study of the effects of specific game design elements on psychological need satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 69, 371–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.033
14-   Salimi, M., Jalali, M., & Yusefi-Tazakor, M. (2019). Elzamat-e memari-ye madares ba ruykard-e afzayesh-e khalaqiyat va tavanmandiha-ye danesh-amuzan [Architectural requirements for schools with an approach to enhancing students' creativity and competencies]. Memari-Shenasi, 2(13), 185–192. https://www.memarishenasi.ir/fa/archive.php?pid=246&rid=14
15-   Scannell, L., & Gifford, R. (2010). Defining place attachment: A tripartite organizing framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2009.09.006
16-   Tabibzadeh, K., Ardeshiri, M., & Banazadeh, B. (2021). Barrasi-ye memari-ye fazaha-ye amuzeshi ba ta'kid bar erteqa-ye keyfiyatha-ye fazayi (Madares-e dokhtaraneh-ye motavaseteh-ye dovvom-e Shiraz) [Investigating the architecture of educational spaces with emphasis on improving spatial quality (Girls' secondary schools in Shiraz)]. Memari-Shenasi, 3(15), 0–0. https://sid.ir/paper/526322/fa
17-   Vijapur, D., Candido, C., Göçer, Ö., & Wyver, S. (2021). A ten-year review of primary school flexible learning environments: Interior design and IEQ performance. Buildings, 11(5), Article 183. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11050183
18-   Woolner, P., McCarter, S., Wall, K., & Higgins, S. (2012). Changed learning through changed space: When can a participatory approach to the learning environment challenge preconceptions and alter practice? Improving Schools, 15(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480211434796
19-   Wouters, P., van Nimwegen, C., van Oostendorp, H., & van der Spek, E. D. (2013). A meta-analysis of the cognitive and motivational effects of serious games. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 249–265. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031311
20-   Yarmohammadian, N., Azamati, S., & Tahersima, S. (2023). Barrasi-ye ta'sir-e mo'allefehaye edrakat-e mohiti-ye fazaha-ye amuzeshi bar erteqa-ye yadgiri-ye danesh-amuzan [Investigating the effect of environmental perception components of educational spaces on enhancing students' learning]. Pazhuhesh-ha-ye Memari-ye Novin, 2(4), 57–71. magiran.com/p2618987
21-   Zainuddin, Z., Chu, S. K. W., Shujahat, M., & Perera, C. J. (2020). The impact of gamification on learning and instruction: A systematic review of empirical evidence. Educational Research Review, 30, Article 100326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2020.100326

  • Receive Date 31 May 2026
  • Revise Date 04 July 2026
  • Accept Date 06 July 2026
  • First Publish Date 10 August 2026
  • Publish Date 23 August 2026