Architectural Technologies Studies

Abstract
Extended Abstract
Aims: In recent decades, sustainability has become a fundamental principle in various fields of development, particularly in urban planning and design. While the environmental and economic dimensions of sustainability are frequently emphasized, its social dimension is often overlooked or conceptually ambiguous. Social sustainability plays a crucial role in ensuring justice, cohesion, and long-term community well-being, and numerous studies have highlighted the importance of social participation, equity, and quality of life. Despite this, there is still no clear consensus regarding its precise definition or how it should be measured. Practically, different approaches have been proposed to promote and evaluate social sustainability through both quantitative and qualitative indicators. These indicators ranging from distributive justice and equitable access to services, to social cohesion and political participation reflect the multidimensional nature of the concept. The shift from basic, traditional indicators to context-based and composite ones demonstrates the transition from static analysis to a dynamic, forward-looking assessment of social sustainability in research and policy-making. Given the growing social challenges in urban environments, such as spatial inequality, social exclusion, and declining civic engagement, a deeper exploration of the theoretical and practical dimensions of social sustainability has become increasingly essential. This article aims to analyze the conceptual evolution of social sustainability, identify its key components, and examine their role in urban planning and design with an emphasis on social justice and local quality of life.
Materials & Methods: This study explores the concept and dimensions of social sustainability in urban spaces using a qualitative, descriptive–analytical approach. The research began with an extensive literature review based on credible Persian and English sources obtained from databases such as Scopus, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar, MagIran, NoorMags, IranDoc, and Civilica. A total of 729 studies were initially identified, and after applying inclusion criteria direct relevance to social sustainability and urban design, scientific credibility, publication between 2000 and 2024, and the presence of applicable indicators 152 studies were selected for detailed analysis. Qualitative content analysis was conducted in three stages: open coding, axial coding, and selective coding, through which core concepts, measurement indicators, urban applications, historical developments, and practical case studies were extracted and organized into major dimensions including social justice, participation, quality of life, and social capital. This systematic process enabled the development of a comprehensive and practical framework for assessing and applying social sustainability in urban design. Clear selection criteria and transparent analytical procedures strengthened the reproducibility and reliability of the study, making its findings applicable to urban planning and policy-making.
Findings: Social sustainability, a key dimension of sustainable development, focuses on the interaction between social, economic, and environmental factors and is closely linked to equality, participation, social cohesion, and quality of life. Challenges include unclear definitions and difficulties in measuring intangible aspects like belonging and social cohesion. Achieving social sustainability requires attention to both quantitative indicators, such as access to public services, and qualitative ones, such as social capital and spatial justice. Theoretically, it emphasizes justice, cohesion, local identity, and citizens’ rights, providing a conceptual framework for analysis and planning. Practically, it involves creating interactive public spaces, developing accessible infrastructure, strengthening responsive institutions, fostering active citizen participation, and aligning policies with sustainable development goals. In urban design, equality, inclusivity, resilience, security, accessibility, social cohesion, and institutionalization are key, while modern indicators also address qualitative aspects like spatial justice, sense of place, social capital, civic participation, and mental well-being. This shift shows that social sustainability goes beyond material provision, requiring the reinforcement of sustainable social relationships, participatory governance, and fair access to urban opportunities and resources to ensure long-term quality of life, social capital, and urban justice.
Conclusion: This study shows that social sustainability in urban design is a multidimensional concept that cannot be achieved through quantitative indicators alone and requires attention to cultural, social, and quality-of-life aspects. Key factors include active citizen participation, spatial justice and equal access to public services, strengthening social capital through trust and social ties, and preserving cultural and local identity. The study’s innovation lies in offering an integrated, locally grounded framework suited to Iranian cultural values, collectivist traditions, and historical identity, making it practically applicable in Iranian cities. Despite challenges like spatial and economic inequality, lack of quality public spaces, and limited civic participation, opportunities exist through local institutions, cultural and historical values, and public awareness of social justice. Achieving social sustainability in Iran therefore requires a comprehensive approach combining policy-making, improving public spaces, empowering civil society, and preserving cultural identity.  

Abstract The city of Tehran, as the capital of Iran, has been undergoing a significant transformation in terms of modern changes and extensive development in public center design. Commercial complexes are considered as common domains for social interactions, communications, and social cognition, reflecting effective urban aspects. However, the neglect of social analysis in the design process may lead to the loss of communication between individuals and public spaces, which can result in undesirable social consequences and psychological and emotional distress within society such as isolation and Social alienation. In this regard, the design and architecture of commercial centers have a prominent role, and further research on the social acceptability of these centers is necessary. The main objective of this comparative research is to examine and compare the influential components of social acceptability based on architectural features in the commercial performance of two different structures, namely traditional market centers and malls. The case studies of this research include the Grand Bazaar of Tehran and Kourosh Mall. This study employs a mixed-method approach, utilizing library research, questionnaires, in-depth interviews, and observations, to investigate the subject both quantitatively and qualitatively. Analysis of the results demonstrates that multi-purpose commercial complexes, through environmental structural factors, possess higher levels of overall acceptability compared to traditional markets, by developing dimensions of greater security. This research contributes to the field of architecture and urban design by highlighting the importance of social analysis in the design process and identifying the influential components of social acceptability in commercial centers.